![]() |
| OHIO AUTOMOBILE DIMINISHED VALUE |
CLEVELAND, Ohio - In the State of Ohio, you are entitled to recover the value that
your vehicle has lost as a result of collision repairs from the insurance
company of the at-fault driver. In addition, if the at-fault party has no
insurance, you can make a claim for your car’s diminished value from your own insurer. Wikipedia tells us that a diminished value appraisal evaluates the difference in the value of a motor vehicle after a collision repair.
Automobile Diminished Value has officially become an entry in
the lexicon of insurance terminology. This article explains what is known as
“inherent diminished value.” It reflects a car’s quantifiable loss in fair
market value subsequent to being repaired after a collision.
Differing from “repair related diminished value” which deals
with faulty repairs and “insurance-related diminished value,” which deals with
an insurer’s use of aftermarket parts in car repairs, “inherent diminished
value” claims are far more common.
It has always been known that used-car buyers favor purchasing a
previously undamaged car to a repaired one. But until CARFAX came along it was
virtually impossible to know one from the other. Now that repaired vehicles can
be easily identified by having the dealer order a CARFAX report, these cars and
the stigma of their being previously repaired eroded their trade-in values,
sometimes considerably. This type of loss is known as “inherent diminished
value.”
In 1984 CARFAX was founded in Columbia, Missouri by a computer expert named Edwin Barnett III working with
Robert Daniel Clark, an accountant from Huntingdon, PA. Barnett was initially
trying to combat odometer fraud. By working closely with the Missouri Automobile Dealers Association, in 1986 he offered the
early version CARFAX vehicle history report to the dealer market. These reports
were developed with a database of
just 10,000 records and were distributed via fax machine. By the end of 1993, CARFAX obtained title information
from nearly all fifty states. In December 1996, the company's website was
launched to offer consumers the same vehicle history reports already available
to businesses. [1]
Different states have reached different conclusions concerning
diminished value. Supreme Court decisions [2] throughout
the United States have provided for recovery for diminution in value of a
damaged vehicle in third-party claims only ( Except GA, KS and WA where you can
collect from your own insurer.) In layman’s terms it simply means that you
can’t make a diminished value claim against your own insurer unless the
at-fault driver was uninsured. If the damages to your car were the fault of
someone else, in Delaware that means their insurance company is liable for payment of your diminished
value loss.
In Siegle v. Progressive Consumers Ins. Co., Carole M. Seigle’s
car was repaired after a collision. The insurer of the at-fault driver,
Progressive Insurance Company, paid to have the vehicle repaired. However,
after the repairs were completed, Siegle discovered that her automobile had
sustained what she characterizes as inherent diminished value, in the amount of
$2,677.19. Siegle submitted this
additional diminished value claim to Progressive, but Progressive declined to
pay it.
Citing McHale v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. [3] and other
opinions, in 2002 Florida’s Supreme Court heard Siegle v. Progressive
and determined as follows: “Although an insurer is not obligated to pay for the
“diminished value” of a properly repaired vehicle in response to a first party claim, the owner of a
vehicle may seek damages in tort for lost value from a tortfeasor who has
caused damage to the vehicle.” In short, Florida’s insurance consumers may seek
compensation for their vehicle’s loss in fair market value from the adverse
insurance company. This is also true in Ohio.
The
Florida Department of Insurance addressed the issue of an insurance company’s liability for payment of diminished value in a document
that clarifies Florida law. Informational Bulletin 84-270 which reads in
pertinent part: “The responsibility of the insurance company for automobile
accident damages is the substantial restoration of the automobile as to
function, appearance, and value. The owner has not been properly indemnified
unless there is no diminution in value of the automobile as it was before the
damage and as it is after repairs.” To summarize the bulletin, in Florida,
insurance companies are expected to indemnify automobile owners for the value
of their vehicles prior to the loss.
How much of a vehicle’s value is ultimately lost after repairs
are completed? The amount of diminished value varies according to many factors.
The year, make, model, mileage, type and severity of prior damage and even a
car’s color can factor in to the equation. Consumers of high-end cars such as
Bentley, Mercedes-Benz and Porsche tend to be more discriminating and usually
won't buy a vehicle that was repaired, regardless of how minor. Diminished
Value can result in 50% of the vehicle's value lost.
How is diminished value calculated? In order to determine the
most equitable settlement amount, the ultimate authority is the used car market
itself. Insurance companies began using a formula known as Rule 17C which was
modeled after a formula once used by Infinity Insurance Company. This formula
contained “modifiers” such as severity of damage and mileage, and then assigned
points accordingly. The total number of points accumulated equaled the amount
of diminished value.
In 2001, the Georgia Supreme Court made an historic ruling in
the case of State Farm Insurance Company v. Mabry. [4] Their
decision impacted how automobile diminished value claims should be treated, not
only in Georgia, but also in Arkansas and most other states. The diminution of
value after a collision has always existed but, until Mabry, insurance companies
refused to pay or even acknowledge diminished value.
The Georgia Insurance Commissioner issued a directive regarding
the Georgia Supreme Court ruling that set precedent for diminished value
claims. What this clarification meant for consumers was that their insurer would
have to settle each claim on an individual basis, because no single formula
could be applied to all diminished value claims. The Commissioner concluded
that the Georgia 17-C formula is to be used only in the event there is no other
methodology to arrive at the diminished value and that it is not sanctioned or
endorsed by the Georgia Department of Insurance. The trial court's order
required State Farm to include an evaluation of diminution in value in its
standard assessment of damages, just as it evaluates other elements of damage,
and to adopt a suitable methodology for doing so.
Many companies that provide automobile diminished value
appraisals use this methodology. Other companies rely on automobile auction
results which show the difference in prices realized between previously
repaired vs. previously unrepaired vehicles. These reports are not specific to
the actual vehicle in question nor do they address the specific repairs that
were done.
Only one indicator can be considered relevant regarding
automobile diminished value - how much less the dealer will offer for your
trade-in as a result of a bad CARFAX report. If a consumer or attorney needs to
hire a diminished value appraiser, the appraisal should preferably be done on
the basis of actual dealer opinions rather than the use of formulas or auction
results. It is advisable to make certain that the appraiser is properly
licensed in any state as an independent adjuster or appraiser and can be available for any
legal proceedings that might follow.
Diminished value appraisal figures should represent what the
vehicle will encounter in the real world of used cars in Ohio. It is the used car
managers at dealerships who provide the most realistic assessment of values
because automobile dealers are the ones purchasing and re-selling the vehicles.
An automobile diminished value appraisal that is compiled in this manner, listing
each dealer, their estimation of how much less they would pay because of the
bad CARFAX and any pertinent comments such as how different variables may have
affected their decisions, carries the most weight. Although it is more time
consuming than using a formulaic approach, it is a valid method by which
accuracy can be obtained.
Although most states including Ohio have not accepted the existence of diminished
value in first-party claims only, drivers who crash their own vehicles still have
recourse by taking a tax-deduction for the diminished value of their
automobiles. [5] IRS Form 4684 is used for casualty losses such
as automobile diminished value. It is advisable to check with an accountant or
CPA to determine exactly what percentage of the appraised amount is
tax-deductible. The cost of the automobile diminished
value appraisal is also tax-deductible on Line 22 of IRS Schedule A.
The St. Lucie Appraisal Company
P.O. Box 2700
Fort Pierce, FL 34954
Phone: (772) 359-4300
Fax: (772) 466-8400
Email: contact@stlucieappraisal.net
_______________________________
![]() |
| AUTOMOBILE DIMINISHED VALUE APPRAISERS |
Automobile Diminished Value Appraisals nationwide including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
The fee for an Automobile Diminished Value
Report is $275.00. You may also make your Credit Card Payment by telephone,
call 772-359-4300. Credit card payments can be made on the PayPal page. Click on "Don't have a PayPal account?" to be taken to the secure credit card payment page.
After making your secure payment please email
the body shop estimate or insurance company appraisal to contact@stlucieappraisal.net or
FAX to 772-466-8400.
| Check our Reviews on Angie's List |
[2] http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/pub_info/summaries/briefs/01/01-1219/01-1219_ans.pdf CAROLE M. SIEGLE, Petitioner, v. PROGRESSIVE CONSUMERS
INSURANCE COMPANY
[3] http://www.3dca.flcourts.org Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, February 9, 1982
4] http://www.gasupreme.us/ http://supreme-court-georgia.vlex.com/vid/farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-mabry-20391714 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MABRY et al., 274 Ga. 498, 556 S.E.2.d 114 (2001)
[5] http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4684.pdf
Updated 04-17-2013


